At FactFinder, we follow a rigorous methodology to ensure the accuracy and reliability of our fact checks. Our process is designed to be transparent, thorough, and fair to all perspectives.
We believe that factual information should be accessible to everyone, and we strive to present our findings in a clear, concise manner that respects our readers' intelligence while providing the context necessary to understand complex topics.
We select claims based on their cultural significance, prevalence, and potential impact on public understanding. Claims may come from user submissions, trending topics, or our own research interests.
Our selection criteria include:
Our research involves consulting primary sources whenever possible, including historical documents, academic publications, interviews, and authenticated artifacts. We prioritize peer-reviewed research and expert opinions from relevant fields.
For each fact check, we:
We evaluate claims based on the quality and quantity of evidence, the reliability of sources, and the consensus among experts in the field. We consider both supporting and contradicting evidence to provide a balanced assessment.
Our evaluation considers:
We use a three-tier rating system:
Claims supported by strong evidence from reliable sources. The claim is accurate and represents the best current understanding of the topic.
Claims that contain elements of truth but may be misleading, incomplete, or lacking definitive evidence. These claims require nuance and context to understand properly.
Claims contradicted by strong evidence from reliable sources. The claim is inaccurate or fundamentally misrepresents the facts.
Each fact check undergoes internal review by at least two team members before publication. We update our fact checks when new evidence emerges or when errors are identified.
Our review process includes: